Business Benefits of Solar

Solar energy seems like such a simple concept. Or at least on the surface it does. Until you really delve into it.

Even beyond the science of it, there is so much to know if you want to really understand your options for paybacks and how long it takes to see a full return on your investment and whether it’s even feasible for your home or business. My brain began to ache, researching info for this story about the benefits of solar for businesses, but it was so worth it. Once I finally get a home to call my own, I’ll be prepared. Hopefully I can help you better grasp it all as well! This is the story I wrote for the Worcester Business Journal.

Image

Solar panel array photo by Living off Grid

Incentives from the federal and state governments are making the installation of solar photovoltaics (PV) more appealing than ever for Central Massachusetts businesses, but it’s not as simple as a business owner’s desire to reduce dependence on traditional energy sources and be eco-friendly.
“It may take a while to get payback on some of these systems, depending on what subsidies you get and how much energy you can put back into the system,” said Joseph Sarkis, professor of management at Clark University’s Graduate School of Business in Worcester. “Many companies just can’t wait multiple years. They need quicker turnaround.”

Solar installers often say customers can get a full return on their investment in three to five years.
Doug Davis, owner of Davis Farmland in Sterling, said he expects his timeframe to be longer. Last April, the farm had a 30.2-kilowatt PV installation of 144 solar panels put on the roof of a barn by Lunenburg-based Moss Hollow Solar. Davis said it generated 38 megawatt hours (MWh) of power in the first year.
He said the installation has outperformed his expectations, especially with the bright and near-snowless winter, but he’s still not planning to see a full return on his $125,000 investment for six to 10 years.
“We were expecting maybe $4,000 a year in electrical savings. Pretty much, we’re right back on track,” he said.
The rest of the return is expected through the state’s Solar Renewable Energy Certificates (SREC) program. It allows those with solar arrays to sell credits for the power they generate back to utility companies, which are required to generate a certain amount of solar electricity. In Massachusetts, those credits are issued quarterly, and were being traded this month for $540 per MWh of electricity.
“Solar PV has got the largest premium for renewable energy,” Sarkis said. “It’s the gold standard and utilities will pay for that.”
As solar demand increases, the value of the credits goes down, so Davis and others in his position can’t say when they’ll make their money back. This is compounded by the uncertainty about how many megawatts panels will produce in a given period.
Those unknowns and the high cost to purchase a PV installation are the biggest factors in whether it’s a viable option for a business.
“We wouldn’t have been able to do it without government funding,” Davis said. The promise of SREC sales for 10 years, a 30-percent rebate and a federal grant for farms covered about half the installation’s $250,000 cost. He said the remaining funding was backed by Rollstone Bank & Trust.
Jim Dumas, a founding principal at Solect Energy Development of Hopkinton, said the funding aspect has been one of the most critical components to having the sale and installation of solar panels succeed.
“The technology works. It’s worked for many years. It’s the easiest part of having one of these systems done. Sometimes, the more challenging part is financial, and that has to do with the newness of the programs helping out with it at the state level.”
He said bank funding has improved since Solect launched in 2009 and that early on, banks were tight in their lending because of the recession and skeptical of firms asking for funding for something as seemingly unfamiliar as solar.
“Most of what we did early on a couple years ago was not only educate potential customers, but to educate banks as to how this all works … how it’s good for everybody,” he said. “I think there’s more success in people seeing others adopting it. The banks are kind of no different than the people buying it.”
To help ease the strain of funding, customers can take part in a rental plan many solar companies offer.
SolarCity, which does business in 13 states, opened a Marlborough location last year. Ed Steins, SolarCity’s northeast regional director, said early adopters to the market usually purchase solar systems outright, and that’s mostly what he’s seen in Massachusetts.
“Our experience has been that as a market matures, you see more and more leasing, and that’s because leasing opens up the market to many more companies that couldn’t afford the upfront expenditure of buying a system.”
Leasing generally means the solar company uses a customer’s roof for solar panels, then owns, insures and maintains them. The customer then pays a lower monthly electricity fee to the company, or can pay up front for several years of power. Dumas said customers usually see double-digit percentage savings in their electric bills when they switch to solar, but that it varies by company and installer.
How Businesses Benefit
Sarkis said businesses often benefit from solar power because of the solar cycle being in sync with a business day, and at peak electricity use times when some utilities use smart grids to charge premium rates. Smart grid technology uses two-way communication between utilities and their customers by way of sensors, advanced controls and computers to determine energy use by time periods and appliances. It also allows customers to have more control over their energy use by giving them the tools to be aware of what they’re consuming. “In the middle of the day, you have lots of companies using energy,” Sarkis said. “If you do have a solar system, the solar supply and peak demand match perfectly, and there’s value in that.”
A downside to the panels themselves is reliability issues due to weather, maintenance needs or snow on the panels, but users can gain a sense of energy security, Sarkis said. “If you’re tied into the grid and there’s a brownout or blackouts, having the solar energy really reduces your risk of those situations.”
Another benefit is the ability of companies to utilize “green marketing,” which is gaining popularity.
“Some companies may take a (financial) loss, but at least their image and reputation as attempting to be environmentally sound could be beneficial,” Sarkis said. He noted that the downside is that a company that’s rising by touting its green efforts can fall that much farther if it’s caught doing something that’s not environmentally sound.
For businesses like Davis Farmland, sustainability is ingrained in the business model. “We’re farmers, which is all about sustaining. Not just in the new green ways. We’re a seventh-generation family farm,’ he said. “We’re trying to sustain this farm, this business, for future generations.”

And if you haven’t read enough, here’s more info that WBJ didn’t run about Davis Farmland’s expected return. This explains it in better detail, I think.

How long will it take for Davis Farmland to see a full return?
Doug Davis, owner of Davis Farmland in Sterling, said the 144-panel, 30.2-kilowatt PV installation on his barn generated 38 megawatt hours (MWh) of electricity in its first year. About half of the $250,000 solar system was funded by federal grants and tax incentives. That leaves about $125,000 the farm must make to see a full return on its investment which will be funded by savings on electricity costs and payments from Solar Renewable Energy Certificates, or SRECs, the farm is guaranteed for 10 years. SRECs incentivize solar by creating an accelerated way for owners of solar installations to make a full return on their investment. One credit is issued for every megawatt hour an installation produces. In Massachusetts, credits are minted on a quarterly basis. Those credits are traded and purchased by energy suppliers, like utilities, who are mostly required to have a certain amount of their electricity generated by renewables. There is no set value for SRECs, as it’s determined by supply and demand. As solar use rises, the cost of SRECs will decline. Davis said the most he can get for an SREC is $585 and the least is $285. Assuming that his farm continues to save $4,000 annually on its electric costs, generates an average of 38 MWh per year and is paid an average of $435 per SREC, his solar panels would pay for themselves in a little more than six years.

Leave a Comment

Filed under renewables

Replacing Paper Towels with Reusable Washcloths

Talk about a simple way to be greener! I was happily surprised when I went to use the restroom at my dentist’s office (shout out to Dr. Hubbard and his awesome staff!)  and saw that in lieu of paper towels, there was a basket of washcloths on the counter and another basket on the floor where the used ones were tossed.


Aside from maybe the restrooms at super fancy restaurants where someone’s standing at the counter waiting for a tip, the only other place I’ve seen anything like this was at the tanning salon I did a stint at during college where we cleaned the beds with white hand towels instead of paper towel.
I’m not sure of the hard numbers of this, but even though towels would have to be washed daily, using (likely) hot water and more energy, I have to think using the cloth towels saves energy and money in the long run, not to mention trees. And it wouldn’t be all that time consuming either.
So if you own a business (or know someone who does), using the washcloths is something I really hope you’ll consider. Maybe it’s even something worth mentioning to a boss if you work at a place small enough to handle this.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Reusing, Uncategorized

Oakland County Recycling Center Gets Revamped

I recently toured a recycling facility in Southfield, Mich., for a video on its process. (Maybe I’ll share that later, but it’s sort of embarrassingly unprofessional.) While I was there, I also found out about the awesome $4 million renovations the center will undergo, starting in October. Below is the story I wrote for The Oakland Press.

A Southfield facility that prepares literally tons of items to be recycled in order to make better use of them is getting its own renovations to be more efficient.
On Oct. 1, the Resource Recovery and Recycling Authority of Southwest Oakland County will begin to undergo $4 million worth of upgrades, expected to be completed by the end of the year.

Michael Csapo, general manager of the Recycling Authority of Southwest Oakland County, explains the process of the Southfield facility.

General Manager Michael Csapo said the retrofit project will change the facility from a dual to single stream system. As a dual stream facility, it requires people recycling to separate paper from plastics and haulers to dump the material into separate parts of their trucks.
“The advantage of a single stream facility is that you can gain collections efficiencies at the curb,” Csapo said. “Instead of having to separate the material at the curb … everything can go into a single container and then into a single compartment of the truck, so you gain great efficiencies in the collection of material.”
A single stream system requires more attention to sorting, he said, so modern technology will be installed to help accomplish that. The technology includes optical sorters for sorting plastics, air classifiers to sort heavy and light items, eddy currents to attract aluminum, magnets to attract things that contain iron, and a series of disc screens that will allow material of different sizes to continue on through the process as other sizes fall through onto separate conveyors.

“All that is quality controlled by manual sorters as well,” Csapo said. He added that employment at the facility will triple from 12.
While the majority of renovations will be inside the facility, new loading docks will be added to make loading the baled materials more efficient, Csapo said.
The Recycling Authority is publicly owned and gets materials from member communities Farmington, Farmington Hills, Novi, Southfield, South Lyon, Walled Lake and Wixom, as well as businesses.
Its renovations are backed by ReCommunity, a privately held company that operates the facility.
“The company that runs this plant under contract with us feels that it’s in their interest because they can attract more material and sort that material more cost effectively if it’s a single stream plant,” Csapo said.
ReCommunity owns and operates dozens of recycling plants throughout the U.S., mostly east of the Mississippi River, he added.
Besides the Recycling Authority, ReCommunity is involved with two other facilities in Michigan: One in Ann Arbor, which it operates, and another in Saginaw, which it owns and operates. Csapo said the Southfield location will be the sixth single stream facility in the state.
“Some of the facilities that are currently processing material in single stream fashion are at or above capacity, so some of that material will make its way here,” he said. “And then also, as more and more collection programs move to single stream, it makes it more convenient for the homeowner to recycle. Convenience equals participation, which means we generate more material.”
Also, get the story here.

1 Comment

Filed under paper, plastics, Recycling, Uncategorized

Battling Bad Skin with Baking Soda — A Year Later

Last August, I wrote about washing my face with baking soda in hopes of keeping my skin clear of acne in a more natural way. That post continues to be one that gets a lot of hits (thank you!), due to people having the same unfortunate situation as me, I suppose.

When I wrote that post, I had just started using the baking soda and the results looked promising. I thought it was only fair to those people hunting for more info that I write an update.

A few friends who decided to try the baking soda regimen quit within a month or so because their skin was too inconsistent with it.

I was happy with the results for a while, but was having inconsistency issues too after a couple months. Then, when the colder, drier air moved in for the winter, the baking soda dried out my skin too much, even using moisturizer.

I went to a regimen of The Body Shop’s Tea Tree Skin Clearing Facial Wash and Arbonne’s FC5 Day Lotion (for oily/combination skin) and night créme (for normal/dry skin). It worked decently well, but still not the way I’d hoped.

My Facial Dream Team

Then, just when I was about to break down and visit the dermatologist my dad swore by, everything was made better — by a vitamin.

While in my beloved Whole Foods one day, I picked up a bottle of the 365 Adult Multi for Women. A quick label comparison against my old One A Days bottle proved that 365 had much more to offer, and in a seemingly more natural way that included herbs (the vitamins look speckly and smell awful too).

The 365 vitamins are packed with nutrients that support skin health like inositol, beet powder, dandelion root, spinach, vitamins K and the Bs, zinc, copper and more.

My face has never looked so good for so long and this is the longest (by FAR) that I have ever gone without using some sort of acne treatment. Part of this could be due to me being older, but I really think it’s very much due to these vitamins.

It seems that there are a few more challenges now that we’re back to the humid summer months, but I’m nervous about messing with a good thing and going back to the baking soda to dry things up.

So I’m curious to know, if you’ve tried it, how did it turn out? Have you had long-term success with baking soda as a face wash? I’d love to hear what’s worked for you and what didn’t.

Thanks for all your support, comments and clicks!

1 Comment

Filed under cosmetics, natural, Uncategorized

Take Your Shoes off at the Door (please!)

As a society, we make a big deal out of washing our hands because of all the things they touch, besides our food and ourselves.

Yet once people know they’re expected to take their shoes off at the door of my place, they treat me with kid gloves or a roll of the eyes, as if I’m overreacting.

What’s sort of funny even is that my mom used to make us take our shoes off at the door, but she gave up on that at some point and now is one of those people whose feet I sometimes cringe at seeing as she walks around with her cute little shoes still on.

Several times, I’ve even tried to relax my uneasiness about it and told people to keep their shoes on when they’re only in for a minute. I get that it can be a hassle.

But in response to my efforts, I’ve often been told things like, “No, it’s OK. I know how you are about that…” as if I’m the crazy one for not wanting whatever gunk, grime and chemicals their shoes have encountered during their lifetime trekked all through my nice clean carpet.

So we should wash our hands because of where they’ve been all day, but keep our shoes on after they’ve been through streets, parking lots, chemical-laden lawns and malls?

I feel like I’m the rational one in this case and those people who think it’s fine to keep their shoes on inside should be the ones spoken to in that kid-friendly tone like they’re wild beasts who we don’t want to upset.

Little shoes, lots of germs

When I walk into other people’s homes, they’ll often remark that it’s OK to keep my shoes on because their floors need to be cleaned anyway, or the carpet already needs to be replaced. Ummm…OK?

While I always want my floors to stay as pretty as when they were first installed, I’m more disgusted at the thought of what we can’t see that’s seeping into them and being spread all over. I lie on my floors. I walk barefoot on them. I don’t want them to be contaminated. Home should be a sanctuary!

As further proof that I’m not crazy, I found this TreeHugger article to back me up.

It says that U.S. Environmental Protection Agency showed that people bring lawn pesticides into their homes on their shoes and that those shoes are a major source of pesticide exposures, especially for young children who “spend a lot of time on the floor and who put dirty fingers, dust, and toys in their mouths.”

According to AChildGrows.com, the EPA’s “Door Mat Study” found that mats in “no shoes homes” had 60 percent less lead dust and chemicals in them than the mats in homes where shoes were allowed. There are also less allergens and bacteria tracked into the homes.

An EPA study also showed that wearing shoes indoors was a larger source of children’s pesticide exposures than eating non-organic fruits and vegetables. Huh.

So we’ve got general grossness, stains and chemicals for the argument against wearing shoes in the house. Here’s another: comfort. One woman blogged that hearing her husband’s shoes in the house made her think of work, not the relaxation of being at home.

In conclusion, how about no shoes in the house? Kick ‘em off at the door and relax, and heck, why not wash your hands too.

6 Comments

Filed under chemicals, epa, Uncategorized

A Green Carpet Cleaner

Last fall, I was in desperate need of a carpet cleaner for the floors my little old lady cat had wrecked. Thanks to Yelp, I unexpectedly found a green carpet cleaner. My search ended there.

Last month, I got the carpets and a sofa done one more time and took the chance to help spread the word about this great business.

What follows is the story I wrote for The Oakland Press, spotlighting the great company that two incredibly nice people have built.

Every couple’s lives change dramatically when they have children. Most don’t alter their business practices because of it though.
Mike and Tina Ersig did.
After about 10 years in the carpet and upholstery cleaning business, the husband and wife, who own what is now called The Greener Cleaner in Troy, changed their cleaning process in 2008 when Tina was pregnant with their first child.
“Three years ago when I was pregnant with my daughter, I did a lot of research and found what was in traditional carpet cleaning methods, and we decided to become an all-green company. Traditional carpet cleaning methods include VOCs, phosphates and even pesticides,” she said.

Mike and Tina Ersig own the Greener Cleaner

VOCs, or volatile organic compounds, are gases that are emitted from certain solids and liquids. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, some may have long- and short-term adverse health effects and are often found in paints, cleaning supplies, building materials and pesticides.
Phosphorus is a naturally occurring element, but scientists say too much of it being used in detergents and fertilizers runs off into lakes and coastal waters, eventually having a negative effect on drinking water.
Ersig said The Greener Cleaner uses top-of-the-line truck-mounted steam-cleaning  equipment similar to other carpet cleaning companies, and what makes it so people and eco-friendly is its EPA-certified cleaning solution, which is, in layman’s terms, made of baking soda, table salt and water.
“It also really helps people with allergies and asthma,” Ersig said, adding that many clients have said their symptoms have decreased after cleanings.
The non-toxic concoction is not only used by the company for carpet and upholstery cleaning, but also tile and grout, as well as mattress cleaning.


Ersig said that since going green, the company has seen a boost in business and that it’s continuing to grow at a fast pace, fueling the need for the company to hire another employee.
Many of the Ersigs’ customers are parents who had been concerned about chemicals being used in their homes and didn’t know a green carpet cleaning option existed.
“Everything that we bring into your home for the cleaning is actually food grade material,” she said. “You don’t have to worry about chemicals in your home after your carpets are clean. You don’t have to worry about your kids or pets being on the carpets and being exposed to anything that couple be harmful to them.”
Other companies offer options they call green, but The Greener Cleaner is said to be the only all-green carpet and upholstery cleaner in Michigan. Mike also is trained and certified by the Institute of Inspection, Cleaning and Restoration, and Tina said less than 15 percent of cleaners have the certification.
She added that being a family-owned and operated company helps it provide a high level of customer service. It offers 24-hour emergency water damage response, using an eco-friendly disinfectant and also doesn’t charge extra for spot treatment and light furniture moving.

To contact The Greener Cleaner, visit greenercleanermichigan.com or call 248-496-1800.
Find the story here too.

1 Comment

Filed under chemicals, environment, Uncategorized

For World Water Day, Ways to Stop Wasting the Resource

Two posts in one night is certainly unheard of for me, but both of tonight’s are important — and someone else has done all the work for both of them. In case you missed it, the first was about purchasing good stuff to aid Japanese relief efforts.

I certainly couldn’t let World Water Day go by without it being acknowledged too though.

WWD is an international day of observance that came out of the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) in Rio de Janeiro where the UN adopted a resolution, creating it. People around the world host events to raise awareness of the importance of freshwater and improving its quality. Each year, a specific theme is adopted for the day.

World Water Day 2011 English logo

According to UNWater.org, “This year’s theme, Water for cities: responding to the urban challenge, aims to spotlight and encourage governments, organizations, communities, and individuals to actively engage in addressing the challenges of urban water management.”

I just thought you might want to know that.

But regardless of the year’s theme, this is the perfect day each year to take into consideration exactly what our own personal water usage is and how it can be reduced.

National Geographic’s environmental page has an incredible wealth of information on the topic, thanks to National Geographic Society’s multi-year freshwater initiative. One of the cool practical things on the site is a Water Footprint Calculator. You’ll be sucked in by the cute graphics of a duck, I swear. See how much water you use (in ways you may not have thought about) and pledge to cut back.

I fared pretty well because I’m a single gal living in an apartment who doesn’t have much money to buy new clothes and furniture and isn’t a big meat eater. See how you rate.

To put our average use into perspective, NatGeo says the average U.S. citizen uses 2,000 gallons of water a day. According to the UN, an American taking a five-minute shower uses more water than a typical person in a developing country slum uses in a whole day. It’s hard to even imagine that.

Another eye-opening page from NatGeo is Water Conservation Tips. Although I am aware of how bad for our planet meat production is, I’m almost embarrassed that I never thought about how much water goes into creating my cotton clothes (more reason to hit up resale shops!), into a cup of coffee (besides what you literally see in your cup!) or even electronics.

A crazy stat from NatGeo’s tips:

“The water required to create your laptop could wash nearly 70 loads of laundry in a standard machine.”

Whaaat?

Even if you only remember one thing from those tips, it’s worth it. Just having one water conservation tip ringing in your head could very likely save you gallons of water and keep it on Earth for a better (lifesaving? nourishing?) use.

Just in case you, for some silly reason, choose not to check out what NatGeo has to offer on the matter, I leave you with two more “wow” stats from the site:

  • It takes about 100 gallons of water to grow and process a single pound of cotton, and the average American goes through about 35 pounds of new cotton material each year. Do you really need that additional T-shirt?
  • On average, a vegan, a person who doesn’t eat meat or dairy, indirectly consumes nearly 600 gallons of water per day less than a person who eats the average American diet.

Please share your water-saving tips with me here! We all need all the help we can get.

And now, I’m going to go quietly contemplate a shower routine that will allow me to cut down on time spent in there and water wasted.

Leave a Comment

Filed under environment, water